Sunday, May 02, 2004

US: Hostage Thomas Hamill Escapes From His Captors

Good news from Iraq - one of Kos' so called "mercenaries" has escaped.

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - American hostage Thomas Hamill, kidnapped three weeks ago in an insurgent attack on his convoy, was found by U.S. forces Sunday south of Tikrit after he apparently escaped from his captors, the U.S. military said. An official said he was in "good health."Hamill, 43, of Macon, Miss., was discovered when he approached a U.S. patrol from the 2nd Battalion 108th Infantry, part of the New York National Guard, in the town of Balad, 35 miles south of Tikrit, a spokesman for U.S. troops in Tikrit said.He identified himself, then led the patrol to the house where he had been held captive. The unit surrounded the house and captured two Iraqis with an automatic weapon, said the spokesman, Maj. Neal O'Brien.Hamill, a truck driver working for a subsidiary of the contractor Halliburton, had a gunshot wound to his left arm that appeared to be infected, and was flown by helicopter to Bagdad, O'Brien said. Video images of Hamill released by his captors a day after his abduction showed his left arm in a sling, suggesting he was wounded during the attack on his convoy."Mr. Hamill apparently escaped from a building," Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt told reporters in Baghdad, saying Hamill was in "good health.""He has spoken to his family. He is now ready to get back to work."In Macon, Hamill's wife, Kellie, said she received a call about 5:50 a.m. telling her that her husband had been found alive. She said it was "the best wakeup call I've ever had."Kellie said one of the first things she did was to wake up their children."There has been a lot of praying and I am so grateful to everybody," she said. "We're all so relieved, so excited."

I can't help but admire the work ethic of those there mercenaries, but it begs the question: Did he receive proper treatment by his captors under the Geneva Conventions?...And if not, Where's Amnesty International and their patented bloody outrage® on this?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home